Monday, June 9, 2025
MindNell - Health & Wellness News
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Health Conditions
    • Cardiovascular
    • Autism
    • Cancer
    • COPD
    • Dementia
    • Digestive Health
  • Wellness
    • Youth’s Health & Wellness
    • Women’s Health & Wellness
    • Men’s Health & Wellness
    • Aging Health & Wellness
    • Sexual Health & Wellness
    • Pregnancy & Postnatal
    • Mental Health
      • Anxiety & Depression
      • ADHD
    • LGBTQI+
  • Fitness & Gym
    • Work Out
    • Yoga & Pilates
  • Parenting
  • Food & Nutrition
    • Healthy Drinks
    • Healthy Recipes
    • Vegans
  • Weight Loss
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Health & Wellness STORE
MindNell
No Result
View All Result
Home Food & Nutrition

Extreme longevity and health optimization: What it really takes

MindNell by MindNell
06/06/2025
in Food & Nutrition
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on PinterestShare by Email


“I wish to know I’m doing completely the whole lot I can to protect my well being for so long as attainable.”

We hear this sort of factor so much.

Folks inform us they not solely wish to keep in good condition as they age, in addition they wish to outlive their friends and age expectations.

Think about you possibly can maximize your healthspan and lifespan, fend off illness, and customarily stay match, lean, and youthful into your 90’s, 100’s, after which some.

Sounds fairly compelling, doesn’t it?

There’s only one drawback: Frequent longevity recommendation appears to contain a rare quantity of effort. And time. And cash. And complexity.

Is all the trouble mandatory? Is it price it?

And, will it even work?

On this article, we’ll discover:

And, we’ll provide help to weigh the professionals and cons so you may make knowledgeable selections about your well being, your physique, and your life.

The myths—and realities—of “optimizing” your well being

Well being and longevity recommendation is all over the place lately: podcasts, books, social media, that man on the fitness center…

Plus, influential “figureheads” have given the motion outsized consideration. Suppose: in style podcasters and well being consultants Dr. Peter Attia, Dr. Andrew Huberman, and Dr. Rhonda Patrick, and biohacker Bryan Johnson.

We perceive the enchantment of this sort of content material. Who doesn’t need a longer, more healthy life? (To not point out the comforting sense of management that may come from designing and executing a “excellent” well being plan.)

However for us at PN, the place we’ve collectively coached lots of of 1000’s of individuals with actual human lives, we all know that “optimum” isn’t sensible.

Not solely that, optimum isn’t mandatory.

Making modest, comparatively constant efforts in the direction of well being and well-being will doubtless offer you higher outcomes than following an intense, extremely “optimized” protocol.

If that sounds onerous to consider, we get it. So let’s discover that daring assertion, beginning with the largest myths surrounding longevity and well being optimization.

Delusion: The “fundamentals” aren’t sufficient.

There’s an concept that getting and staying wholesome should require a set of complicated, “leading edge” methods—particularly in case your purpose is to survive the common American.

In actuality, the “fundamentals” work actually, actually effectively. (These are issues like exercising recurrently; consuming a nutrient-rich food regimen; getting satisfactory sleep; managing stress; and staying socially related. We’ll focus on these extra later.)

Solely, only a few individuals do the fundamentals constantly.

The true purpose extra individuals aren’t residing as lengthy, or as effectively, as they could possibly be isn’t as a result of they’re not taking ice baths or getting vitamin C infusions…

It’s as a result of they’re not doing the (comparatively) easy stuff, constantly.

In the event you’re actually, really doing a well-rounded set of health-promoting behaviors with 80-90 p.c consistency, you’re in all probability already near peak optimization.

Delusion: Extra is healthier

If a handful of primary behaviors get outcomes, then doing them completely and as a lot as attainable will provide help to get, and keep, even more healthy—proper?

Not so quick. There’s a legislation of diminishing returns in the case of well being and health efforts.

Graph shows that with small amounts of health effort, longevity can improve a lot, but as those efforts increase, longevity benefits plateau

Plus, in our expertise, doing too many issues or including in an excessive amount of complexity to your well being and health regime can:

  • Add danger components that might really make your well being and health worse (reminiscent of power accidents or burnout as a consequence of overtraining, and/or nutrient deficiencies or disordered consuming as a consequence of an over-preoccupation with “clear” or restrictive consuming).
  • Make it more durable so that you can maintain good habits. Individuals who tackle an excessive amount of usually tend to burn out. Analysis reveals individuals who attempt to accomplish a number of targets are much less dedicated and much less more likely to succeed than these targeted on a single purpose.1
  • Make your life much less fulfilling, which in flip compromises well being. Striving to maximise bodily well being can intrude with psychological, emotional, and social well-being, which performs a necessary position in healthspan and lifespan. (One research confirmed individuals with excessive ranges of happiness and life satisfaction lived as much as 10 years longer than individuals with low ranges.2)

And what’s the purpose of residing longer when you’re not residing a full, well-rounded, fulfilling life? Whereas some effort is certainly vital, previous a sure level, extra isn’t essentially higher.

Delusion: Slicing-edge methods supply vital advantages.

Let’s say you may put all these superior, complicated methods into motion with out sacrificing consistency or life enjoyment, or compromising your total well-being.

They’d must repay, wouldn’t they?

Not essentially.

A lot of the analysis on longevity optimization (to date) is both in mice, is observational, is theoretical, or has been examined on very small numbers of individuals for very brief durations of time.

Actually, most of the fringe strategies and dietary supplements touted by influencers or biohackers are usually not solely unproven however even probably unsafe.3 4 5 6

Level being: Put your efforts in the direction of foundational well being behaviors with confirmed monitor data (the sort we’ll cowl on this article) earlier than you put money into fringe efforts.

Delusion: It’s all or nothing.

You would possibly assume, “Properly, I’m not getting away from bed at 5 a.m. 5 occasions every week to go working for 60 to 90 minutes to optimize my VO₂ max, so I’ll as effectively simply settle for I’m not going to be a wholesome individual.”

Some of us really feel overwhelmed by the concept of optimizing their well being, so that they determine they may as effectively do nothing.

Nonetheless, our inside information reveals which you can be removed from “excellent” to get outcomes.

In our yr lengthy PN Teaching program, even shoppers who practiced their (primary) habits lower than half of the time acquired measurable outcomes.

10-49% consistency gets results; ALT TEXT: Graph shows men and women with 10 to 49 percent consistency still lost 11 pounds, 8 to 11 inches in girths, and 2 to 3 inches from waist

(Learn extra: Nearly 1 million data points show what it REALLY takes to lose fat, get healthy, and change your body)

Don’t let optimization tradition persuade you nice well being is past your capabilities.

As a substitute, we encourage you to…

  • Think about your choices. Overview the info, and get a transparent understanding of which behaviors are most definitely to provide the finest bang to your buck.
  • Get clear on the tradeoffs. Determine which issues you’re, and aren’t prepared to decide to.
  • Make selections that align along with your targets. Together with what sort of way of life you need, and the way you wish to spend your time and {dollars}.

Preserve studying and we’ll information you thru it.

The advantages—and tradeoffs—of a wholesome way of life

Placing effort in the direction of your well being is nice. However efforts include tradeoffs.

Right here’s a have a look at each the efforts, and the tradeoffs, to realize the well being you need for your self.

Large image shows six categories of health levels: coasting, light effort, medium, high, very high, and extreme. The medium and high categories offer the best “return on investment” in terms of effort and sacrifice versus overall health benefits.

A deeper look: The simplest well being behaviors (and their optimum dose)

If you wish to scale back your danger of power illness, and customarily keep more healthy for longer, what do you have to do?

As we mentioned earlier, the difficulty isn’t that we’d like some extremely detailed, cutting-edge protocol. The fundamentals work. The difficulty is that most individuals don’t do them.

For instance, as proven within the picture under, most individuals don’t get sufficient fruits and veggies, sleep, or train. And the quantity of people that do all these items regularly (whereas additionally avoiding tobacco and minimizing alcohol) is extraordinarily low: doubtless a fraction of a p.c.

Graph shows only 10 percent of people eat 5 servings of fruits and veggies daily; 15 percent sleep 7 to 9 hours a night’ 24 percent get recommended weekly aerobic and resistance exercise; 71 percent drink moderately or less; and 89 percent don’t smoke

Lastly, let’s take a more in-depth have a look at what these fundamentals are, and the “candy spot” of effort versus reward.

Foundational Well being Conduct #1: Train recurrently

All well being consultants agree: Shifting your physique is vital.

Sure, train will provide help to keep lean, and enhance temper, power, and performance, however it’ll additionally provide help to keep alive (and more healthy) for longer.

Actually, a research of Harvard alumni discovered that any quantity of bodily exercise reduces the danger of dying from any trigger. Train prolonged lifespan no matter physique weight, blood strain, smoking habits, or genetic predisposition.7

One other research of 272,550 older adults discovered partaking in even low quantities of bodily exercise considerably decreased danger of dying from most cancers, heart problems, and all causes.8

Particularly, steep danger declines occurred when accumulating a minimum of 7.5 MET-hours* of exercise per week. The best improve in advantages got here from reaching 7.5 to fifteen MET hours. Rising exercise past that additional decreases danger, however at a regularly decrease price, because the graph under reveals.

Graph show that cancer mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality all decrease as exercise increases, with the greatest increase in benefits from achieving 7.5 to 15 MET hours of exercise per week

*MET-hours (Metabolic Equal Hours) measures the power value of exercise, primarily based on period and depth. Some examples: 2 hours of resting = ~2 MET-hours; 2 hours of moderate-intensity cardio exercise = ~8 MET-hours; 2 hours of reasonable resistance coaching = ~7 MET-hours.

Rising the depth of train is an environment friendly option to rack up MET-hours, however plain outdated strolling counts too: In a research of 28,000 adults, each 1,000 every day step improve was related to a 12 p.c decrease danger of dying. (This affiliation started at 2,500 steps and continued as much as 17,000 steps.)9

(Cool factoid: For folk involved with dementia particularly, one research confirmed that getting simply 3,826 steps per day was related to a 25 p.c diminished danger of dementia—and getting 9,826 steps per day was related to a 50 p.c decrease danger!10)

Ideally, cardiovascular exercise is paired with resistance or weight-bearing train.

Resistance coaching helps well being and longevity in numerous methods: it will probably assist protect worthwhile muscle mass, keep psychological sharpness, enhance odds of surviving most cancers, help metabolic well being, and customarily provide help to keep alive.11

Amongst older adults particularly, falls are a number one reason for dying.12 Resistance coaching can each forestall the danger of falls–due to improved stability and muscle stability13—in addition to scale back the danger of great damage–due to higher bone density.14Image shows how resistance training and aerobic training benefit numerous areas of health, such as cognitive function, blood sugar regulation, mobility, and more.

A sedentary way of life does the other, rising danger of heart problems, diabetes, hypertension, most cancers (breast, colon, colorectal, endometrial, and epithelial ovarian most cancers), and all-cause mortality.15

Actually, 20 years of sedentary way of life is related to twice the danger of untimely dying in comparison with being bodily energetic.16

▶ How a lot train do you have to do?

Commonplace train suggestions recommend:17

  • 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity cardio exercise, or 75 minutes per week of vigorous cardio exercise (or some mixture of each), plus
  • 2 classes per week of resistance coaching, concentrating on most main muscle teams

Getting as much as 300 minutes per week of moderate-intensity or 150 minutes of vigorous-intensity cardio exercise (or some mixture of each) in addition to three resistance coaching classes per week gives additional advantages.

▶ Are individuals getting sufficient train?

Most individuals are usually not.

Solely 24 p.c meet the suggestions for each cardio and resistance train. And fewer than 47 p.c of American adults meet suggestions for cardio bodily exercise.17

▶ Is getting greater than the advisable quantity higher?

For essentially the most half sure, however previous a sure level, extra effort delivers much less profit—and probably extra danger.

Overtraining (and/or under-recovering) can disrupt hormone ranges, mess with sleep and temper, trigger extra fatigue, chronically elevate your coronary heart price, trigger accidents, and extra.18 19 Excessive volumes of endurance train coaching could also be detrimental for the guts, and improve danger of myocardial fibrosis, coronary artery calcification, and atrial fibrillation.20 21 22 23

So, the advantages of train exist on a U-shaped curve. (This is named the “Excessive Train Speculation,”24 as seen within the picture under.)

Graph shows a u-shaped curve where health risks are highest when exercise is either very low or extremely high, with the least risks at moderate or high exercise.

A “excessive” quantity of train is sweet for you, however the “highest” quantity attainable in all probability isn’t. (Well being advantages doubtless max out round 7-10 hours of cardio, and 3-4 resistance coaching classes per week.)

We like what one research concluded: “If the mantra ‘train is drugs’ is embraced, underdosing and overdosing are attainable.”25

Foundational Well being Conduct #2: Eat a nourishing, nutrient-rich food regimen

Consuming effectively doesn’t must be difficult. There are just a few key components to nail down, and the remaining is as much as your individual private preferences and wishes.

We propose specializing in three vitamin fundamentals.

Dietary key #1: Eat extra complete and minimally-processed meals

Complete and minimally-processed meals are naturally nutrient wealthy—full with fiber, wholesome fat, nutritional vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals—and much much less calorie-dense than highly- or ultra-processed meals (UPFs). Additionally they have much less sugar, sodium, and trans fat—the latter which is straight linked to an elevated danger of heart problems, breast most cancers, issues throughout being pregnant, colon most cancers, diabetes, weight problems, and allergy.26 27 28

These qualities contribute to their many well being advantages; Diets wealthy in complete or minimally-processed meals are related to decrease charges of despair,29 30 31 coronary heart illness,32 kind 2 diabetes,33 most cancers,34 and improved longevity.35

The most important research on processed meals—which included nearly 10 million contributors—discovered UPFs are linked to 32 dangerous results, together with kind 2 diabetes, psychological well being issues, weight problems, heart problems, and all-cause mortality.36

One other research discovered {that a} greater consumption of ultra-processed meals (4 or extra servings every day) was related to a 62 p.c elevated danger of all-cause mortality. (For every extra serving of ultra-processed meals, all-cause mortality elevated by 18 p.c.)37

Not that you might want to be plucking tomatoes straight off the vine.

Consuming a minimally processed meals food regimen is extra about total dietary patterns—and shifting alongside the continuum of enchancment—slightly than rigidly avoiding all types of processing.

Illustrated table shows various foods types and their whole, minimally processed, or ultra-processed options. All foods exist on this continuum between whole and ultra-processed.

▶ What number of minimally-processed meals do you have to eat?

There at the moment aren’t any formal pointers for the quantity of minimally-processed meals to eat. In our expertise teaching over 100,000 shoppers, we discover persons are most glad, and get vital well being enhancements, when 70 to 80 p.c of their food regimen comes from complete or minimally-processed meals.

Any enchancment counts although. In the event you’re at the moment consuming only a few complete and minimally processed meals, getting a minimum of 50 p.c of your food regimen from these meals would make a giant distinction to your well being, power, and longevity.

▶ Are individuals consuming sufficient minimally-processed meals?

No.

Current US information reveals that Individuals get about 28.5 p.c of their energy from complete or minimally-processed meals, and 56 p.c of their energy from highly- or ultra-processed meals.38

▶ Is getting greater than the advisable quantity higher?

Not past a sure level.

In the event you need to, consuming as much as 90 p.c of energy from minimally-processed meals will really maximize your advantages, however past that there are doubtless no additional advantages.

In addition to, some processed meals improve well being slightly than detract from it. Take into consideration the protein powder that helps you meet your protein necessities, the business salad dressing that helps you eat your greens, or the weekly brownie à la mode you share along with your grandkid that brings pleasure to each of your lives.

(Learn extra: What you should know about minimally-processed foods vs. highly-processed foods)

Dietary key #2: Eat 5 vegetables and fruit

You’ve heard it 1,000,000 occasions. We’ll be the nag and say it once more: Eat your fruits and veggies.

An enormous research involving over 1.8 million individuals confirmed that consuming extra vegetables and fruit was considerably related to a decreased danger of dying—with the advantages plateauing at 5 servings a day. Individuals who ate 5 servings a day had a 13 p.c decrease danger of dying from any trigger in comparison with individuals who ate two servings per day.39

Moreover, the consumption of vegetables and fruit very doubtless reduces the danger of hypertension, coronary coronary heart illness, and stroke; in all probability reduces the danger of most cancers; and probably prevents weight achieve.40

▶ What number of vegetables and fruit do you have to eat?

A wholesome goal is 5 fist-sized servings of vegetables and fruit every day. (Typically, we advocate dividing that into three servings of veggies and two servings of fruit.)

For bonus factors, attempt to eat a wide range of colours.

The pigments in fruits and veggies come from numerous healthful vitamins (referred to as phytochemicals or phytonutrients). Totally different colours imply totally different phytochemicals, providing you with a various array of those helpful compounds, that are doubtless accountable for a majority of the well being advantages of vegetables and fruit.

(Learn extra: What the colors of fruits and vegetables mean)

▶ Are individuals consuming sufficient vegetables and fruit?

No.

Individuals solely eat a median of two.5 servings of produce (fruit and greens mixed) per day.41

Solely 12.2 p.c of individuals meet fruit consumption suggestions, and fewer—9.3 p.c—meet vegetable consumption suggestions.

A mere ten p.c of Individuals get a full 5 servings of vegetables and fruit mixed per day.42

▶ Is getting greater than the advisable quantity higher?

There are doubtless diminishing returns to consuming greater than the above strategies.

In that large research talked about earlier that noticed 1.8 million individuals, the life-extending advantages of fruits and veggies plateaued at 5 servings per day.39

In different phrases, greater consumption (past two servings of fruit and three servings of greens) was not related to extra illness danger discount.

That mentioned, there could also be different advantages to consuming extra vegetables and fruit. For instance, as a consequence of their fiber and water content material, vegetables and fruit are filling but low in energy, to allow them to help weight administration—and so they actually aren’t going to hurt your well being.

Dietary key #3: Eat sufficient protein

Protein is a very powerful macronutrient to get proper, particularly as we age.

Plant protein particularly is linked to a diminished danger of heart problems and dying from all causes.43 44 45

When it comes to animal proteins, the outcomes are extra blended. (That mentioned, analysis on protein consumption and mortality is mostly primarily based on observational research that don’t give us clear concepts about trigger and impact.) Typically, minimally processed types of fish, poultry, and low-fat dairy are one of the best animal protein sources.

To reduce well being dangers reminiscent of diabetes, heart problems, and most cancers, restrict processed types of purple meat (like bacon, sizzling canines, deli slices, and pepperoni sticks). Even unprocessed types of purple meat ought to doubtless be restricted to about 18 oz (~4 to five palm-sized parts) or much less per week.46 47 48

Nonetheless, whatever the supply, getting ample protein—a minimum of 1.2 g of protein per kg of physique weight—considerably reduces the danger for sarcopenia (muscle loss), frailty, and neuromuscular decline.49 50

Protein can also be important for sustaining and constructing muscle, conserving bones and smooth tissues wholesome, supporting immunity, and extra. It’s additionally essentially the most satiating macronutrient, and thus useful for fats loss and/or physique recompositioning.

▶ How a lot protein do you have to eat?

The present USDA advice for protein consumption is a minimum of 0.8 grams of protein per kg of physique weight (0.35 g/lb). Nonetheless, newer analysis suggests that is doubtless the absolute minimal quantity, and just for comparatively younger sedentary people.

A greater minimal consumption for many is probably going 1.2 g/kg (0.55 g/lb, or about 3 to five palm-sized parts of protein-rich meals), particularly for older adults, as they’re at larger danger of muscle loss.

Protein consumption for muscle progress and retention, and/or if performing resistance coaching or different vigorous train can be 1.6 to 2.2 g/kg (0.75-1 g/lb), or about 4 to eight palm-sized parts of protein-rich meals.

▶ Are individuals consuming sufficient protein?

That relies on how “sufficient” is outlined.

Most adults eat a minimum of 0.8 g/kg. Nonetheless, as much as 10 p.c of younger girls and as much as 46 p.c of older adults don’t hit this mark.51 And, as famous, that advice might be conservative in comparison with the best consumption.

Protein can also be particularly vital for these on GLP-1 drugs (Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound) to assist forestall the muscle loss they will result in. Aiming for a minimum of 1.2 g/kg is significant for this inhabitants, particularly if they’re additionally older. (Getting nearer to 1.6 g/kg is even higher, if attainable.)

▶ Is getting greater than the advisable quantity higher?

When you rise up to 1.2 g/kg, not essentially. That quantity is probably going satisfactory for many, particularly sedentary of us.

In the event you’re attempting to construct muscle and energy or get better from vigorous train, or are taking GLP-1 remedy for fats loss, striving in the direction of 1.6 g/kg would provide help to obtain that purpose extra simply.

In the event you’re attempting to maximise energy and muscle features, and/or are doing numerous strenuous train, consuming 1.6-2.2 g/kg is perfect (with the very best finish of that vary maxing out all advantages).

What about dietary supplements?

Dietary supplements make up a big a part of the dialogue round getting old, however in actuality solely play a small position in the case of rising well being and longevity.

Utilizing dietary supplements (like a multivitamin, or physician advisable vitamin D or iron) to stop or appropriate deficiencies could be useful for total well being well-being.

Then, there are different dietary supplements which have fairly sturdy monitor data and might help us meet dietary wants (protein powder), enhance efficiency (creatine), or probably even gradual getting old (fish oil would possibly gradual organic getting old by a small quantity).52

Nonetheless, the buzziest, trendiest dietary supplements are sometimes much less confirmed.

For instance, curcumin, spirulina, and ginger are sometimes listed as dietary supplements which may assist with irritation, a trademark of getting old. Nonetheless, the analysis right here remains to be early, and much from definitive.

There are additionally even much less substantiated dietary supplements which may modify different points of getting old (resveratrol, NAD+, NAC), however the proof is both very minimal or solely in animal fashions.

Some dietary supplements (particularly natural dietary supplements) may even trigger hurt, like liver harm.53

If you wish to give dietary supplements a strive, examine for high-quality third-party seals of approval from organizations reminiscent of NSF.

Examine.com—an internet database that gives impartial analysis summaries and analyses on hottest dietary supplements—can also be a wonderful useful resource that will help you decide which dietary supplements would possibly really be efficient.

Regardless, discuss to your healthcare supplier earlier than taking dietary supplements, significantly when you take different remedy.

Foundational Well being Conduct #3: Get satisfactory sleep

Analysis reveals that males who get sufficient high quality sleep reside nearly 5 years longer than males who don’t, and ladies who get sufficient reside two and a half years longer.54

Research additionally present sleep is simply as vital to your coronary heart well being as train, complete meals, weight administration, ldl cholesterol, blood strain, and blood sugar management.55

In comparison with 7 hours of sleep per day, a 1 hour lower in sleep period has been related to an 11 p.c elevated danger of heart problems and a 9 p.c elevated danger of kind 2 diabetes.56

Older adults who sleep lower than 6 hours per night time are at greater danger for dementia and cognitive decline than those that sleep 7 to eight hours.57 (Deep sleep helps clear beta-amyloid plaques and wash out toxins from our mind, considered partially accountable for dementia.)

▶ How a lot sleep do you have to get?

Sleep consultants agree that 7 to 9 hours an evening on common—with a minimum of 7 hours of sleep most nights of the week—is good for many.

Nonetheless, the precise supreme hours might differ individual to individual.

Typically, the correct amount of sleep for you is the quantity that permits you to really feel comparatively refreshed shortly after waking up, and permits you to go to sleep comparatively simply at bedtime, with comparatively sustained power all through the day.

▶ Are individuals getting sufficient sleep?

A few third of US adults don’t meet the advisable quantity of seven to 9 hours of sleep per night time.58

▶ Is getting greater than the advisable quantity higher?

Not essentially.

Evidently 7 to 9 hours of sleep an evening is good when it comes to well being outcomes.56

Apparently, longer sleep period (over 9 hours per night time on common) is related to an elevated danger of heart problems, kind 2 diabetes, and total mortality.59 60 61

Nonetheless, it’s not clear that these dangers are brought about by sleeping extra. Simply as doubtless, it might be different well being issues (reminiscent of despair, sleep apnea, or heavy alcohol consumption) that result in each longer sleep occasions and greater well being dangers.

(Learn extra: Transform your sleep—The scientific way to energize your body, sharpen your mind, and stop hitting snooze)

Foundational Well being Conduct #4: Handle stress

When left unchecked for lengthy durations of time (say, months or years with out durations of restoration), stress can have detrimental results on practically each facet of our well being, because the under picture reveals.

Image shows the variety of effects chronic, unmanaged stress can have on the body, from brain fog, frequent infection, poor recovery, weight gain, and more.

Persistent stress—which tends to extend coronary heart price, blood strain, and irritation—will increase the danger of heart problems.62 63 64 Moreover, long-term stress tends to worsen psychological and emotional well being, rising the danger of tension and despair.65 It might additionally make individuals extra more likely to flip to substances like alcohol as an try to cope.66

That mentioned… Not all stress is unhealthy.

Actually, stress is a standard, pure, and even helpful a part of life; the correct amount helps us really feel motivated, purposeful, and engaged with life.

So, slightly than avoiding or demonizing stress, it’s useful to work with it, utilizing it as a possibility to develop wholesome coping mechanisms, acceptable restoration methods, and total resilience.

And this doesn’t essentially imply sitting on a cushion and meditating.

Stress administration can embrace easy mindset shifts: Practising self-compassion,67 having a progress mindset,68 and framing stress as a standard and even helpful a part of life69 have all been related to higher coping underneath stress.

Primary self-regulation expertise additionally assist. This includes noticing and naming what you’re feeling, having good management over your actions, and utilizing a broad vary of coping expertise to assist your self course of feelings and get better from stress. With these expertise, you construct self-awareness and the flexibility to deal with challenges higher, as a result of you know the way to calm your self down after an activating occasion—no matter the way it went.

The under picture presents a spectrum of extra—small and massive—methods to control stress.

Image shows a continuum of options for stress management, ranging from 1 to 10 on an effort scale.

▶ How a lot stress administration do you have to interact in?

Consider stress administration and restoration as a factor you do in proportion to the stress and calls for of your life.

We frequently use the analogy of a jug: When stress drains your tank, stress administration and restoration practices assist fill it again up once more.

Image shows a faucet pouring water into a jug next to a list of recovery practices. These are things that fill your recovery jug. There is also a faucet draining water out of the jug next to a list of stressors. These are things that drain your jug. The goal is to fill your jug as much as you are draining it.
And, as with the entire foundational well being habits we’ve mentioned, each little bit counts.

Whether or not you’re experiencing slightly or lots of stress in your life, even three to 5 minutes of purposeful restoration—doing deep respiratory workout routines, some journaling or mild stretching, or simply stepping exterior to get some contemporary air and hearken to the birds—might help fill your tank.

▶ Are individuals doing sufficient to handle stress?

In all probability not.

Within the US, over 1 / 4 of individuals report that almost all days, they’re so harassed they will’t operate.70 In Canada, it’s comparable: Slightly below 1 / 4 of individuals say that almost all days of their life are both “fairly a bit” or “extraordinarily” worrying.71

Moreover, over a 3rd of individuals say they don’t know the place to begin in the case of managing their stress.72

▶ Is getting greater than the advisable quantity higher?

Not essentially.

The purpose is to search out your stress “candy spot.” As a result of all of us get pleasure from and tolerate differing kinds and quantities of stress, how you’re feeling is definitely a reasonably good indicator of whether or not stress is just too low, too excessive, or “good.”

Because the picture under reveals, when you usually really feel bored and purposeless, stress is probably going too low; when you really feel energized and engaged, stress might be near your “candy spot”; and when you really feel panicky or so overwhelmed you’ve began to really feel hopeless, stress is probably going too excessive.

Image shows a continuum of stress. When stress is too low, we feel bored or purposeless. When stress is just right, we feel energized and engaged. When stress is too high, we feel anxious or numb.

Whereas having a routine for stress administration is a great concept, there’s doubtless some extent of diminishing returns right here too. In the event you’re in that stress “candy spot” (energized/engaged, not bored and never overwhelmed), then including extra stress discount strategies won’t assist additional—and may very well add stress by providing you with yet one more process to do.

Foundational Well being Conduct #5: Keep socially related

You won’t consider social connection as a well being crucial, however it’s.

Not solely is the social and emotional help related to improved well-being, it’s additionally related to diminished danger of untimely dying.73 74 When relationships are sturdy, individuals have a 50 p.c elevated probability of survival throughout any given time.75

Actually, one of many longest working research—the Examine of Grownup Growth out of Harvard Medical Faculty, which has been monitoring contributors for over 87 years (and counting)—discovered that sturdy relationships had been the largest predictor of not solely life satisfaction however longevity. (Relationships had been extra predictive of those outcomes than social class, wealth, IQ, or genetics.)76

No shock, not having a social circle comes with its personal distinct dangers.

Social isolation and loneliness can improve an individual’s danger for coronary heart illness and stroke, kind 2 diabetes, despair and anxiousness, suicidality and self-harm, dementia, and earlier dying.77 78

A continuously cited statistic highlights its profound impression:

The impact of social isolation on mortality is corresponding to smoking as much as 15 cigarettes per day79—surpassing even the dangers related to weight problems and bodily inactivity.80

▶ Are individuals getting sufficient social connection?

It appears many people may use extra buddies.

About 1 in 3 adults report feeling lonely, and 1 in 4 report not having social and emotional help.77

Eight p.c of adults say they don’t have any shut buddies, 53 p.c say they’ve between one and 4 shut buddies, and 38 p.c report having 5 or extra buddies.81

▶ How a lot social connection do you have to purpose for?

Typically talking, analysis finds that individuals who have three to 5 shut buddies they recurrently work together with (one to 3 occasions per week, in-person or through telephone name) get essentially the most social profit.82 83 84 85

On common, interplay with a smaller group of individuals tends to offer extra profit than a big community of acquaintances.86

That mentioned, particular person wants differ. In the event you really feel authentically related to others, have a robust sense of belonging, and customarily really feel socially fulfilled, that’s what issues most.

▶ Is getting greater than the advisable quantity higher?

Probably not. Some proof means that extreme social engagement (every day or a number of occasions every day) really would possibly improve mortality danger.87 That’s in all probability as a result of over-socializing can improve psychological, emotional, and bodily fatigue,88 and infrequently this degree of socialization contains alcohol or different probably dangerous behaviors.

Moreover, it will probably take away time and power that could possibly be put in the direction of different life-building and health-promoting behaviors (like work, train, or sleep).

The takeaway? Try for socializing that brings worth to your life. No want so as to add a lot that you just wind up exhausted, or unable to maintain up with different priorities.

Foundational Well being Conduct #6: Reduce identified harms

Minimizing actions we all know to be dangerous is a key a part of taking care of your long-term well being, but it may be simple to miss these items. (Perhaps as a result of we’d slightly hold doing them.)

Two of the largest culprits are smoking and ingesting alcohol.

Hurt Avoidance Key #1: Don’t Smoke

Everyone knows smoking is unhealthy for us. However smoking remains to be comparatively frequent:

  • Within the US, 10.9 p.c of adults smoke cigarettes, and 6.6 p.c smoke e-cigarettes.89
  • Globally, the pattern is even greater: 22.3 p.c of the world’s inhabitants use tobacco (36.7 p.c of males and seven.8 p.c of ladies).90

The WHO estimates greater than 8 million individuals die prematurely yearly from tobacco use (with a further 56,000 individuals dying yearly from chewing tobacco).91 This makes tobacco a number one (i.e. high 3) danger issue for untimely dying and all-cause mortality.92

Smoking can also be a danger issue for a number of power situations, together with coronary coronary heart illness, stroke, emphysema, and most cancers.93 (Globally, a couple of quarter of most cancers deaths are attributed to smoking.90)

Hurt avoidance key #2: Restrict alcohol

At this level, the analysis is fairly clear: Alcohol has detrimental implications to your well being, particularly previous a sure level of standard use.

Two graphs show that risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer increase a lot with heavy drinking, and a little with moderate drinking

Alcohol performs a causal position in 200+ ailments, significantly liver ailments, coronary heart ailments, a minimum of seven kinds of cancers, despair, anxiousness, alcohol use issues, and dementia.94 95

In 2019, 2.6 million deaths worldwide had been attributable to alcohol consumption.96 For individuals within the 15-49 age vary, alcohol is the main danger issue for dying, with 3.8 p.c of feminine deaths and 12.2 p.c of male deaths attributable to alcohol use.97

▶ How a lot alcohol is “secure” to drink?

US steerage on alcohol suggests conserving consumption at reasonable ranges, or much less.98

A reasonable consumption means:

  • Two drinks or much less per day for males (14 or much less per week), with not more than 4 at a single sitting
  • One drink or much less per day for ladies (7 or much less per week), with not more than 3 at a single sitting

Importantly, a drink is outlined as containing 14 grams (about 0.6 fluid ounces) of pure ethanol, which equates to:

  • 12 ounces of standard beer (5% alcohol by quantity)
  • 5 ounces of desk wine (12% alcohol by quantity)
  • 1.5 ounces of 80-proof distilled spirits (40% alcohol by quantity)

▶ Are individuals limiting their alcohol sufficient?

Within the US, individuals are inclined to drink greater than the advisable pointers.

In 2021, the Nationwide Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism reported that the common American aged 21 or older consumed 2.51 gallons of pure alcohol over the course of a yr—equal to about 10 customary drinks/week.99 Nonetheless, analysis suggests surveys usually underestimate consumption by 40 to 50 p.c.100 Additional, different analysis reveals that the heavier an individual drinks, the extra considerably they’re more likely to underestimate and/or underreport their ingesting.101

All that to say, the common American is probably going having extra (and even way more) than 10 drinks per week.

Add to that:

  • In 2016, 36.4 p.c of Individuals (age 15+) mentioned that they had a minimum of one episode of binge ingesting (6+ drinks in a single session) within the final month102
  • About 7 p.c of the world’s inhabitants aged 15+ years have an alcohol use dysfunction96
  • Alcohol-related deaths have been rising: within the final 5 years, alcohol-induced deaths have elevated by 26 p.c103

▶ Is extra abstinence from alcohol higher?

In 2023, the WHO launched an announcement saying no quantity of alcohol is “secure.”104 This interpretation remains to be debated, and information continues to emerge.

Right here’s our take: An abstinence-only coverage is probably going a failed coverage for a lot of. Quite, we wish individuals to be told to allow them to make intentional selections.

To be clear, alcohol will not be helpful for bodily well being; it’s a identified human carcinogen. Nonetheless, whereas alcohol does improve well being dangers, danger doesn’t rise in a linear style with consumption. Which means, small doses are unlikely to have a major impression in your well being. However if you drink extra closely, the dangers rise exponentially.105

Consuming closely can imply both:

  • Having greater than 7 drinks in every week for a lady, or greater than 14 drinks in every week for a person, or
  • Having 4 or extra drinks in a single sitting for a lady, or 5 or extra drinks in a single sitting for a person (binge ingesting).

(Reminder: A single drink refers to these definitions talked about beforehand. Pints of beer, and closely poured wine glasses and cocktails are greater than single servings… Simply because it suits in a single glass doesn’t imply it counts as “one” drink.)

In the end, it’s about discovering the extent of danger you’re prepared to tolerate relative to no matter advantages you’re feeling alcohol gives you.

Our normal suggestions:

  • In the event you’re in any other case wholesome and don’t have any different alcohol-related danger components, restrict ingesting to reasonable ranges or much less
  • In the event you’re in any other case wholesome however have one or two alcohol-related danger components (reminiscent of breast most cancers historical past), restrict ingesting to mild ranges (1 to three or 4 drinks per week) with occasional reasonable intakes on particular events, or much less
  • When you have a number of alcohol-related danger components (reminiscent of breast most cancers historical past, household historical past of alcoholism, or contraindicated drugs) abstain from alcohol fully

Foundational Well being Conduct #7: Do Primary Preventive Well being Measures

In all of the chatter about longevity optimization, it may be simple to neglect about all of the boring—however no much less vital—issues that provide help to keep secure and wholesome all through your life.

These embrace issues like:

  • Getting common check-ups, or seeing your physician or healthcare supplier if questions or considerations come up
  • Getting advisable bloodwork, screenings, and vaccines
  • Getting and conserving blood ldl cholesterol, sugar, and strain in advisable ranges as early as attainable
  • Often seeing your dentist, and recurrently brushing and flossing
  • Practising safer intercourse
  • Seeing medical specialists as advisable or acceptable (OBGYN, optometrist, ENT, dermatologist, and so on.)
  • Sporting seatbelts (Buckling up within the entrance seat reduces danger of deadly damage by 45 p.c!106)
  • Sporting a helmet when biking, skateboarding, or motorbiking
  • Often sporting sunscreen (Used appropriately, sunscreen decreases danger of pores and skin cancers by 40 to 50 p.c107 108)
  • Defending your listening to (Untreated listening to loss will increase dangers for despair, social isolation,109 110 cognitive decline,111 dementia,112 113 and falls114 115)

… And customarily utilizing frequent sense. (As in, keep away from the “maintain my beer” kind stuff.)

Primary well being upkeep and danger avoidance practices matter—so much.

Notably, we are able to’t management each factor of the environment. Some components influencing our well being are extra structural and systemic, woven into the material of our societies.

These are referred to as social determinants of well being, and embrace poverty, racism, homophobia, lack of lodging for disabilities, and displacement (as within the case of refugees). For some of us, doing the above protecting behaviors—like visiting the household physician, getting glasses, going to the dentist, and even strolling safely down the road—might be more durable, typically close to not possible.

This isn’t meant to be a throwaway line that diminishes the troublesome actuality for therefore many individuals, however slightly a gritty, sensible mantra: Do one of the best you may with what you’ve acquired.

▶ How a lot preventative well being care do you might want to do?

Typically talking, purpose to be in line with the habits you realize you “ought to” do.

the drill: Brush and floss every day; put on your helmet each time you experience a motorbike; put on your seatbelt each time you drive; placed on sunscreen if you exit into the noon solar; don’t recurrently blast your music at full quantity; and so forth.

And when you’ve got lingering issues in your “I ought to actually try this” listing (like getting that bizarre mole checked out, or that bloodwork completed), go do it.

▶ Are individuals practising sufficient primary preventative well being measures?

We’ve provided a long-ish listing of primary well being practices that may defend well being, so we gained’t go into every in-depth.

That mentioned, when wanting on the above listing, it’s in all probability truthful to say most individuals will discover just a few behaviors they may follow extra constantly.

For instance, whereas most of us are actually in line with our seat belts (utilization is near 92 p.c!116), many people may escape the floss extra usually (solely 32 p.c of Individuals floss every day117).

And, analysis reveals that solely about half of cyclists and motorcyclists put on helmets when driving118 119 120 (and use is even decrease amongst skate boarders and rollerbladers121).

Listening to loss is the primary modifiable danger issue for dementia,122 so be sure you additionally observe the “60/60 rule” when you prefer to pump up the tunes in your headphones: Hear at 60 p.c of your gadget’s most quantity for 60 minutes, then take a break. (And put on earplugs if you mow the garden!)

▶ Are extra preventative measures higher?

As soon as once more, there’s doubtless a legislation of diminishing returns in the case of preventative well being measures, similar to the whole lot else.

The purpose isn’t to change into obsessive about eliminating all attainable dangers at each flip.

Quite, it’s that affordable efforts in the direction of defending your well being do depend, and so they‘re immeasurably extra vital for total well being than the most recent optimization fads.

Bonus Foundational Well being Conduct: Foster a way of goal and that means

Analysis constantly reveals that having a robust sense of goal and that means for our life improves our well being, total well-being, and longevity too.123

A way of goal appears to assist individuals reside longer, even when controlling for different markers of psychological well-being.

There’s one thing uniquely helpful about having a robust goal that’s totally different from, say, being glad.

Having a robust sense of goal can imply many issues, nevertheless it usually signifies that you’ve got targets, and an purpose in life.

This goal could be many issues:

  • Serving to others
  • Being related to household and/or shut buddies
  • Being a key a part of a neighborhood
  • Having fun with a interest
  • Studying new expertise

Having goal might assist with longevity for just a few causes:

It makes you extra more likely to interact in health-promoting behaviors, reminiscent of getting sufficient sleep and consuming extra vegetables and fruit.123

It additionally tends to enhance psychological well being. For instance, one research confirmed that folks with the strongest sense of goal had a 43 p.c diminished danger of despair.123

Lastly, it might merely assist individuals reside longer as a result of it makes you wish to reside longer. When individuals have a way of goal, they usually wish to reside longer, more healthy lives, to allow them to fulfill that goal to its fullest. And whereas eager to reside gained’t make it so, it actually doesn’t harm.

Nonetheless enthusiastic about optimizing? Think about these extra tradeoffs

We hope it’s clear by now: You may take your self actually far with some stable fundamentals (that may themselves take some respectable effort and time!).

However, if you wish to go even additional, your effort may need to extend exponentially, simply as these features change into much less sure, and extra marginal.

Right here’s what to bear in mind.

First, it takes lots of time (and cash) to optimize.

Let’s examine the time and monetary funding of two imaginary individuals.

The primary individual is what you would possibly name a “wholesome” or “medium effort” individual. They’re somebody who’s fairly constantly assembly the entire above suggestions.

The second individual is what you would possibly name an “optimizer.” They do all of the above suggestions, however to the max, and most of the fringe suggestions usually mentioned on health-related podcasts and books.

How a lot money and time would possibly every of those individuals put money into their well being efforts on a weekly foundation? Right here’s what which may appear like.

Table compares various activities and costs of a regular healthy person and an “optimizer”. Generally, it takes 3 to 4 times the time and cost to “optimize” exercise, nutrition, and self-care activities.

On high of that, there are “optimizing” behaviors and assessments that could be carried out much less usually—say, month-to-month, seasonally, yearly, and even each few years. After all, these practices will nonetheless require money and time, so despite the fact that they’re much less frequent, they nonetheless must be accounted for.

Listed below are some examples of these sorts of merchandise, therapies, and exams:

  • Dietary dietary supplements (vitamin, mineral, and/or natural dietary supplements; “superfoods”; fish oil; probiotics, resveratrol, NAD+, NAC, curcumin, & extra)
  • Bloodwork testing (for superior lipid testing, inflammatory markers, hormone ranges, and nutrient standing)
  • IV remedy (for hydration, nutritional vitamins, glutathione, or NAD+)
  • Infrared sauna classes
  • Plasma transfusions
  • Gene remedy
  • Stem cell remedy
  • Medical tourism and therapeutics retreats
  • Full-body MRIs
  • Genetic testing
  • Concierge medical companies
  • And extra…

Although it’s onerous to estimate the price of this stuff, opting to do only a handful may simply value an additional $10,000+ per yr.

General, we’d estimate it takes a minimum of three to 4 occasions the time, effort, and cash to observe an “optimizer” kind way of life, in comparison with a plain outdated “wholesome” way of life.

As we’ve seen above, this 3-4x effort will doubtless translate to some further advantages, however the medium-effort “wholesome” way of life will doubtless get most individuals a minimum of 80 p.c of the outcomes they’re after (reminiscent of improved lifespan, healthspan, and high quality of life).

In addition to, optimizing too a lot can negatively impression your well-being and high quality of life.

The more durable and extra excessive somebody’s health or well being regime, the more durable they usually fall off the wagon. So, taking over an excessive amount of can really put you extra vulnerable to quitting the foundational well being behaviors we talked about earlier.

Even when you keep it up, over-focusing on well being and longevity will nearly actually intrude along with your skill to get pleasure from a full, well-rounded, significant life.

For instance, when you get too targeted on bodily well being, it’s possible you’ll discover different points of your deep health and total wellbeing undergo, reminiscent of your relational, existential, psychological, and emotional well being.

Image shows that there are six domains of deep health: social, physical, existential, emotional, mental, and environmental.

Take this a step additional, and “optimizing” can tip over into obsession. Generally, underneath the floor of “I simply actually care about my well being” is disordered consuming, orthorexia, or one other psychological well being situation.

Graph shows that with small amounts of health effort, life satisfaction and overall well-being can improve a lot, but as those efforts increase, well-being benefits plateau

This, to us, is the guts of issues: It’s vital to not solely keep comparatively wholesome, but additionally to get pleasure from your life whilst you’re residing it.

Actually, having fun with your life isn’t separate from good well being. It’s a part of it.

What to do subsequent

1. Make clear your targets.

Take a step again and take into account what you actually need most for your self.

What sort of life do you wish to have?

How vital is it to maximise your healthspan and lifespan, and the way does that line up along with your different priorities?

2. Think about the tradeoffs.

Given what you need most for your self, and the assets you’ve obtainable, what’s sensible for you?

How a lot time, cash, and energy are you prepared to place in to realize well being and lifespan targets?

What are you ready to surrender? What aren’t you ready to surrender?

3. When trying to make enhancements, begin with the fundamentals first.

Overview the foundational well being behaviors on this article. What number of of them are you already doing? Constantly?

In the event you’re overlaying a lot of the fundamentals, you won’t have to do extra. (Give your self a pat on the again. You’re already elite!)

Or, possibly there’s some room for enchancment and also you’d prefer to step it up a bit. Nice! For the overwhelming majority of individuals, enhancing any of those behaviors will ship actual, tangible outcomes. Begin with these, earlier than chasing faddish, fringe, “super-optimal” stuff.

4. Tune out the noise.

These individuals you hear on podcasts or social media aren’t the consultants on you and your life.

You get to determine what you need, and go about getting it.

Be trustworthy with your self, and make decisions aligned with what issues most to you.

There’s loads of recommendation on the market, however keep in mind: It’s your life. You get to make selections that work for you.

References

Click on right here to view the knowledge sources referenced on this article.

  1. Dalton, Amy N., and Stephen A. Spiller. 2012. “Too Much of a Good Thing: The Benefits of Implementation Intentions Depend on the Number of Goals.” The Journal of Client Analysis 39 (3): 600–614.
  2. Diener, Ed, and Micaela Y. Chan. 2011. “Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity.” Utilized Psychology. Well being and Properly-Being 3 (1): 1–43.
  3. Suarez-Lledo, Victor, and Javier Alvarez-Galvez. 2021. “Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.” Journal of Medical Web Analysis 23 (1): e17187.
  4. Crawford, Cindy, Bharathi Avula, Andrea T. Lindsey, Abraham Walter, Kumar Katragunta, Ikhlas A. Khan, and Patricia A. Deuster. 2022. “Analysis of Select Dietary Supplement Products Marketed to Support or Boost the Immune System.” JAMA Community Open 5 (8): e2226040.
  5. Crawford, Cindy, Courtney Boyd, Bharathi Avula, Yan-Hong Wang, Ikhlas A. Khan, and Patricia A. Deuster. 2020. “A Public Health Issue: Dietary Supplements Promoted for Brain Health and Cognitive Performance.” Journal of Various and Complementary Drugs (New York, N.Y.) 26 (4): 265–72.
  6. White, C. Michael. 2022. “Continued Risk of Dietary Supplements Adulterated with Approved and Unapproved Drugs: Assessment of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Tainted Supplements Database 2007 through 2021.” Journal of Medical Pharmacology 62 (8): 928–34.
  7. Paffenbarger, R. S., Jr, R. T. Hyde, A. L. Wing, and C. C. Hsieh. 1986. “Physical Activity, All-Cause Mortality, and Longevity of College Alumni.” The New England Journal of Drugs 314 (10): 605–13.
  8. Watts, Eleanor L., Charles E. Matthews, Joshua R. Freeman, Jessica S. Gorzelitz, Hyokyoung G. Hong, Linda M. Liao, Kathleen M. McClain, Pedro F. Saint-Maurice, Eric J. Shiroma, and Steven C. Moore. 2022. “Association of Leisure Time Physical Activity Types and Risks of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality among Older Adults.” JAMA Community Open 5 (8): e2228510.
  9. Jayedi, Ahmad, Ali Gohari, and Sakineh Shab-Bidar. 2022. “Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” Sports activities Drugs (Auckland, N.Z.) 52 (1): 89–99.
  10. Del Pozo Cruz, Borja, Matthew Ahmadi, Sharon L. Naismith, and Emmanuel Stamatakis. 2022. “Association of Daily Step Count and Intensity with Incident Dementia in 78 430 Adults Living in the UK.” JAMA Neurology 79 (10): 1059–63.
  11. Abou Sawan, Sidney; Nunes, Everson A.; Lim, Changhyun; McKendry, James; Phillips, Stuart M.. “The Health Benefits of Resistance Exercise: Beyond Hypertrophy and Big Weights.” Train, Sport, and Motion 1(1):e00001, Winter 2023.
  12. “Falls.” n.d. Accessed Might 6, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls.
  13. Sadaqa, Munseef, Zsanett Németh, Alexandra Makai, Viktória Prémusz, and Márta Hock. 2023. “Effectiveness of Exercise Interventions on Fall Prevention in Ambulatory Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.” Frontiers in Public Well being 11 (August): 1209319.
  14. Massini, Danilo A., Flávio H. Nedog, Thiago P. de Oliveira, Tiago A. F. Almeida, Caroline A. A. Santana, Cassiano M. Neiva, Anderson G. Macedo, et al. 2022. “The Effect of Resistance Training on Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 10 (6): 1129.
  15. Park, Jung Ha, Ji Hyun Moon, Hyeon Ju Kim, Mi Hee Kong, and Yun Hwan Oh. 2020. “Sedentary Lifestyle: Overview of Updated Evidence of Potential Health Risks.” Korean Journal of Household Drugs 41 (6): 365–73.
  16. Zisko, Nina, Kjerstin Næss Skjerve, Atefe R. Tari, Silvana Bucher Sandbakk, Ulrik Wisløff, Bjarne M. Nes, and Javaid Nauman. 2017. “Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI), Sedentary Behavior and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Clustering – the HUNT Study.” Progress in Cardiovascular Ailments 60 (1): 89–95.
  17. “Train or Bodily Exercise.” 2024. September 25, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/exercise.htm.
  18. Carrard, Justin, Anne-Catherine Rigort, Christian Appenzeller-Herzog, Flora Colledge, Karsten Königstein, Timo Hinrichs, and Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss. 2022. “Diagnosing Overtraining Syndrome: A Scoping Review.” Sports activities Well being 14 (5): 665–73.
  19. Weakley, Jonathon, Shona L. Halson, and Iñigo Mujika. 2022. “Overtraining Syndrome Symptoms and Diagnosis in Athletes: Where Is the Research? A Systematic Review.” Worldwide Journal of Sports activities Physiology and Efficiency 17 (5): 675–81.
  20. Breuckmann, Frank, Stefan Möhlenkamp, Kai Nassenstein, Nils Lehmann, Susanne Ladd, Axel Schmermund, Burkhard Sievers, et al. 2009. “Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Prevalence, Pattern, and Prognostic Relevance in Marathon Runners.” Radiology 251 (1): 50–57.
  21. Wilson, M., R. O’Hanlon, S. Prasad, A. Deighan, P. Macmillan, D. Oxborough, R. Godfrey, et al. 2011. “Diverse Patterns of Myocardial Fibrosis in Lifelong, Veteran Endurance Athletes.” Journal of Utilized Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 110 (6): 1622–26.
  22. Möhlenkamp, Stefan, Nils Lehmann, Frank Breuckmann, Martina Bröcker-Preuss, Kai Nassenstein, Martin Halle, Thomas Budde, et al. 2008. “Running: The Risk of Coronary Events : Prevalence and Prognostic Relevance of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Marathon Runners.” European Coronary heart Journal 29 (15): 1903–10.
  23. Müssigbrodt, A., A. Weber, J. Mandrola, Y. van Belle, S. Richter, M. Döring, A. Arya, P. Sommer, A. Bollmann, and G. Hindricks. 2017. “Excess of Exercise Increases the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation.” Scandinavian Journal of Drugs & Science in Sports activities 27 (9): 910–17.
  24. Eijsvogels, Thijs M. H., Paul D. Thompson, and Barry A. Franklin. 2018. “The ‘Extreme Exercise Hypothesis’: Recent Findings and Cardiovascular Health Implications.” Present Therapy Choices in Cardiovascular Drugs 20 (10): 84.
  25. Franklin, Barry A., and Scott Billecke. 2012. “Putting the Benefits and Risks of Aerobic Exercise in Perspective.” Present Sports activities Drugs Studies 11 (4): 201–8.
  26. Oteng, Antwi-Boasiako, and Sander Kersten. 2020. “Mechanisms of Action of Trans Fatty Acids.” Advances in Vitamin 11 (3): 697–708.
  27. Souza, Russell J. de, Andrew Mente, Adriana Maroleanu, Adrian I. Cozma, Vanessa Ha, Teruko Kishibe, Elizabeth Uleryk, et al. 2015. “Intake of Saturated and Trans Unsaturated Fatty Acids and Risk of All Cause Mortality, Cardiovascular Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.” BMJ 351 (August): h3978.
  28. Dhaka, Vandana, Neelam Gulia, Kulveer Singh Ahlawat, and Bhupender Singh Khatkar. 2011. “Trans Fats-Sources, Health Risks and Alternative Approach – A Review.” Journal of Meals Science and Know-how 48 (5): 534–41.
  29. Ortega, Miguel A., Óscar Fraile-Martínez, Cielo García-Montero, Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, Guillermo Lahera, Jorge Monserrat, Maria Llavero-Valero, et al. 2022. “Biological Role of Nutrients, Food and Dietary Patterns in the Prevention and Clinical Management of Major Depressive Disorder.” Vitamins 14 (15): 3099.
  30. Piao, Jingjing, Yingwei Wang, Tianqi Zhang, Jiayu Zhao, Qianyu Lv, Mengyu Ruan, Qin Yu, and Bingjin Li. 2023. “Antidepressant-like Effects of Representative Types of Food and Their Possible Mechanisms.” Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 28 (19): 6992.
  31. Saghafian, Faezeh, Hanieh Malmir, Parvane Saneei, Alireza Milajerdi, Bagher Larijani, and Ahmad Esmaillzadeh. 2018. “Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Risk of Depression: Accumulative Evidence from an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies.” The British Journal of Vitamin 119 (10): 1087–1101.
  32. Juul, Filippa, Georgeta Vaidean, and Niyati Parekh. 2021. “Ultra-Processed Foods and Cardiovascular Diseases: Potential Mechanisms of Action.” Advances in Vitamin (Bethesda, Md.) 12 (5): 1673–80.
  33. Du, Shutong, Valerie Ok. Sullivan, Michael Fang, Lawrence J. Appel, Elizabeth Selvin, and Casey M. Rebholz. 2024. “Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Risk of Diabetes: Results from a Population-Based Prospective Cohort.” Diabetologia 67 (10): 2225–35.
  34. Kliemann, Nathalie, Fernanda Rauber, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Vivian Viallon, Eszter P. Vamos, Reynalda Cordova, Heinz Freisling, et al. 2023. “Food Processing and Cancer Risk in Europe: Results from the Prospective EPIC Cohort Study.” The Lancet. Planetary Well being 7 (3): e219–32.
  35. Fadnes, Lars T., Carlos Celis-Morales, Jan-Magnus Økland, Solange Parra-Soto, Katherine M. Livingstone, Frederick Ok. Ho, Jill P. Pell, et al. 2023. “Life Expectancy Can Increase by up to 10 Years Following Sustained Shifts towards Healthier Diets in the United Kingdom.” Nature Meals 4 (11): 961–65.
  36. Lane, Melissa M., Elizabeth Gamage, Shutong Du, Deborah N. Ashtree, Amelia J. McGuinness, Sarah Gauci, Phillip Baker, et al. 2024. “Ultra-Processed Food Exposure and Adverse Health Outcomes: Umbrella Review of Epidemiological Meta-Analyses.” BMJ (Medical Analysis Ed.) 384 (February): e077310.
  37. Rico-Campà, Anaïs, Miguel A. Martínez-González, Ismael Alvarez-Alvarez, Raquel de Deus Mendonça, Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga, Clara Gómez-Donoso, and Maira Bes-Rastrollo. 2019. “Association between Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and All Cause Mortality: SUN Prospective Cohort Study.” BMJ (Medical Analysis Ed.) 365 (Might): l1949.
  38. Wolfson, Julia A., Anna Claire Tucker, Cindy W. Leung, Casey M. Rebholz, Vanessa Garcia-Larsen, and Euridice Martinez-Steele. 2025. “Trends in Adults’ Intake of Un-Processed/Minimally Processed, and Ultra-Processed Foods at Home and Away from Home in the United States from 2003-2018.” The Journal of Vitamin 155 (1): 280–92.
  39. Wang, Dong D., Yanping Li, Shilpa N. Bhupathiraju, Bernard A. Rosner, Qi Solar, Edward L. Giovannucci, Eric B. Rimm, et al. 2021. “Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality.” Circulation 143 (17): 1642–54.
  40. Boeing, Heiner, Angela Bechthold, Achim Bub, Sabine Ellinger, Dirk Haller, Anja Kroke, Eva Leschik-Bonnet, et al. 2012. “Critical Review: Vegetables and Fruit in the Prevention of Chronic Diseases.” European Journal of Vitamin 51 (6): 637–63.
  41. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://odphp.health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/2015-2020_Dietary_Guidelines.pdf.
  42. Lee-Kwan, Seung Hee, Latetia V. Moore, Heidi M. Blanck, Diane M. Harris, and Deb Galuska. 2017. “Disparities in State-Specific Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption – United States, 2015.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 66 (45): 1241–47.
  43. Naghshi, Sina, Omid Sadeghi, Walter C. Willett, and Ahmad Esmaillzadeh. 2020. “Dietary Intake of Total, Animal, and Plant Proteins and Risk of All Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” BMJ (Medical Analysis Ed.) 370 (July): m2412.
  44. Haghighatdoost, Fahimeh, Noushin Mohammadifard, Parisa Zakeri, Jamshid Najafian, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Hamidreza Roohafza, and Nizal Sarrafzadegan. 2023. “Differences in All-Cause Mortality Risk Associated with Animal and Plant Dietary Protein Sources Consumption.” Scientific Studies 13 (1): 3396.
  45. Chen, Zhangling, Marija Glisic, Mingyang Track, Hamid A. Aliahmad, Xiaofang Zhang, Alice C. Moumdjian, Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, et al. 2020. “Dietary Protein Intake and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: Results from the Rotterdam Study and a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” European Journal of Epidemiology 35 (5): 411–29.
  46. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.aicr.org/cancer-prevention/recommendations/limit-consumption-of-red-and-processed-meat/#what-the-science-says.
  47. “Most cancers: Carcinogenicity of the Consumption of Pink Meat and Processed Meat.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat.
  48. Li, Chunxiao, Tom R. P. Bishop, Fumiaki Imamura, Stephen J. Sharp, Matthew Pearce, Soren Brage, Ken Ok. Ong, et al. 2024. “Meat Consumption and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: An Individual-Participant Federated Meta-Analysis of 1·97 Million Adults with 100 000 Incident Cases from 31 Cohorts in 20 Countries.” The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology 12 (9): 619–30.
  49. Phillips, Stuart M., Stéphanie Chevalier, and Heather J. Leidy. 2016. “Protein ‘Requirements’ beyond the RDA: Implications for Optimizing Health.” Utilized Physiology Vitamin and Metabolism 41 (5): 565–72.
  50. Houston, Denise Ok., Barbara J. Nicklas, Jingzhong Ding, Tamara B. Harris, Frances A. Tylavsky, Anne B. Newman, Jung Solar Lee, et al. 2008. “Dietary Protein Intake Is Associated with Lean Mass Change in Older, Community-Dwelling Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study.” The American Journal of Medical Vitamin 87 (1): 150–55.
  51. Hengeveld, Linda M., Jolanda M. A. Boer, Pierrette Gaudreau, Martijn W. Heymans, Carol Jagger, Nuno Mendonça, Marga C. Ocké, et al. 2020. “Prevalence of Protein Intake below Recommended in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis across Cohorts from the PROMISS Consortium.” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 11 (5): 1212–22.
  52. Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike A., Stephanie Gängler, Maud Wieczorek, Daniel W. Belsky, Joanne Ryan, Reto W. Kressig, Hannes B. Stähelin, et al. 2025. “Individual and Additive Effects of Vitamin D, Omega-3 and Exercise on DNA Methylation Clocks of Biological Aging in Older Adults from the DO-HEALTH Trial.” Nature Growing old 5 (3): 376–85.
  53. Navarro, Victor J., Ikhlas Khan, Einar Björnsson, Leonard B. Seeff, Jose Serrano, and Jay H. Hoofnagle. 2017. “Liver Injury from Herbal and Dietary Supplements.” Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 65 (1): 363–73.
  54. Li, H., F. Qian, L. Han, W. Feng, D. Zheng, X. Guo, and H. Zhang. 2024. “Association of Healthy Sleep Patterns with Risk of Mortality and Life Expectancy at Age of 30 Years: A Population-Based Cohort Study.” QJM: Month-to-month Journal of the Affiliation of Physicians 117 (3): 177–86.
  55. Makarem, Nour, Cecilia Castro-Diehl, Marie-Pierre St-Onge, Susan Redline, Steven Shea, Donald Lloyd-Jones, Hongyan Ning, and Brooke Aggarwal. 2022. “Redefining Cardiovascular Health to Include Sleep: Prospective Associations with Cardiovascular Disease in the MESA Sleep Study.” Journal of the American Coronary heart Affiliation 11 (21): e025252.
  56. Chaput, Jean-Philippe, Caroline Dutil, Ryan Featherstone, Robert Ross, Lora Giangregorio, Travis J. Saunders, Ian Janssen, et al. 2020. “Sleep Duration and Health in Adults: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.” Utilized Physiology Vitamin and Metabolism 45 (10 (Suppl. 2)): S218–31.
  57. Winer, Joseph R., Kacie D. Deters, Gabriel Kennedy, Meghan Jin, Andrea Goldstein-Piekarski, Kathleen L. Poston, and Elizabeth C. Mormino. 2021. “Association of Short and Long Sleep Duration with Amyloid-β Burden and Cognition in Aging.” JAMA Neurology 78 (10): 1187–96.
  58. “Sleep Well being.” 2023. December 27, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/sleep-health.htm.
  59. Han, Han, Ying Wang, Tongtong Li, Chengwu Feng, Catherine Kaliszewski, Yang Su, Yinfan Wu, Jian Zhou, Liang Wang, and Geng Zong. 2023. “Sleep Duration and Risks of Incident Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality among People with Type 2 Diabetes.” Diabetes Care 46 (1): 101–10.
  60. Wang, Yafeng, Wentao Huang, Adrienne O’Neil, Yutao Lan, Dagfinn Aune, Wei Wang, Chuanhua Yu, and Xiong Chen. 2020. “Association between Sleep Duration and Mortality Risk among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study.” Diabetologia 63 (11): 2292–2304.
  61. Jike, Maki, Osamu Itani, Norio Watanabe, Daniel J. Buysse, and Yoshitaka Kaneita. 2018. “Long Sleep Duration and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.” Sleep Drugs Evaluations 39 (June): 25–36.
  62. Satyjeet, Fnu, Sidra Naz, Vinesh Kumar, Norah H. Aung, Kanwal Bansari, Sana Irfan, and Amber Rizwan. 2020. “Psychological Stress as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease: A Case-Control Study.” Cureus 12 (10): e10757.
  63. Vaccarino, Viola, and J. Douglas Bremner. 2024. “Stress and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update.” Nature Evaluations. Cardiology 21 (9): 603–16.
  64. Ebstrup, Jeanette Frost, and Torben Jørgensen. 2012. “Stress and cardiovascular disease.” Ugeskrift for laeger 174 (4): 204–7.
  65. Schneiderman, Neil, Gail Ironson, and Scott D. Siegel. 2005. “Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants.” Annual Overview of Medical Psychology 1 (1): 607–28.
  66. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2021/03/one-year-pandemic-stress#:~:text=Nearly.
  67. Neff, Kristin D. 2023. “Self-Compassion: Theory, Method, Research, and Intervention.” Annual Overview of Psychology 74 (1): 193–218.
  68. Dweck CS. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random Home Publishing Group; 2006.
  69. Jamieson, Jeremy P., Alia J. Crum, J. Parker Goyer, Marisa E. Marotta, and Modupe Akinola. 2018. “Optimizing Stress Responses with Reappraisal and Mindset Interventions: An Integrated Model.” Anxiousness, Stress, and Coping 31 (3): 245–61.
  70. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2022/concerned-future-inflation.
  71. Authorities of Canada, and Statistics Canada. 2023. “Perceived Life Stress, by Age Group.” Authorities of Canada, Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310009604.
  72. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2023/collective-trauma-recovery.
  73. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25663/social-isolation-and-loneliness-in-older-adults-opportunities-for-the.
  74. Reblin, Maija, and Bert N. Uchino. 2008. “Social and Emotional Support and Its Implication for Health.” Present Opinion in Psychiatry 21 (2): 201–5.
  75. Holt-Lunstad, Julianne, Timothy B. Smith, and J. Bradley Layton. 2010. “Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review.” PLoS Drugs 7 (7): e1000316.
  76. “Harvard Second Era Examine.” n.d. Harvardstudy. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.adultdevelopmentstudy.org/.
  77. CDC. 2025. “Well being Results of Social Isolation and Loneliness.” Social Connection. February 3, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/social-connectedness/risk-factors/.
  78. “Loneliness Linked to Dementia Threat in Giant-Scale Evaluation.” n.d. Nationwide Institute on Growing old. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/loneliness-linked-dementia-risk-large-scale-analysis.
  79. Holt-Lunstad, Julianne. 2024. “Social Connection as a Critical Factor for Mental and Physical Health: Evidence, Trends, Challenges, and Future Implications.” World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Affiliation (WPA) 23 (3): 312–32.
  80. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connection-advisory.pdf.
  81. Goddard, Isabel. 2023. “What Does Friendship Seem like in America?” Pew Analysis Middle. October 12, 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/10/12/what-does-friendship-look-like-in-america/.
  82. Martino, Jessica, Jennifer Pegg, and Elizabeth Pegg Frates. 2017. “The Connection Prescription: Using the Power of Social Interactions and the Deep Desire for Connectedness to Empower Health and Wellness.” American Journal of Life-style Drugs 11 (6): 466–75.
  83. Kang, Weixi. 2023. “Understanding the Associations between the Number of Close Friends and Life Satisfaction: Considering Age Differences.” Frontiers in Psychology 14 (March): 1105771.
  84. Dunbar, Robin. 2011. “How Many ‘Friends’ Can You Really Have?” IEEE Spectrum 48 (6): 81–83.
  85. Steptoe, Andrew, Aparna Shankar, Panayotes Demakakos, and Jane Wardle. 2013. “Social Isolation, Loneliness, and All-Cause Mortality in Older Men and Women.” Proceedings of the Nationwide Academy of Sciences of the USA of America 110 (15): 5797–5801.
  86. Falci, Christina & McNeely, Clea. (2009). “Too Many Friends: Social Integration, Network Cohesion and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms.” Social Forces – SOC FORCES. 87. 10.1353/sof.0.0189.
  87. Stavrova, Olga, and Dongning Ren. 2021. “Is More Always Better? Examining the Nonlinear Association of Social Contact Frequency with Physical Health and Longevity.” Social Psychological and Character Science 12 (6): 1058–70.
  88. Leikas, Sointu, and Ville-Juhani Ilmarinen. 2017. “Happy Now, Tired Later? Extraverted and Conscientious Behavior Are Related to Immediate Mood Gains, but to Later Fatigue.” Journal of Character 85 (5): 603–15.
  89. “Cigarette Smoking and Digital Cigarette Use.” 2024. September 4, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/smoking.htm.
  90. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://ourworldindata.org/smoking.
  91. “Tobacco.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco.
  92. US Burden of Illness Collaborators, Ali H. Mokdad, Katherine Ballestros, Michelle Echko, Scott Glenn, Helen E. Olsen, Erin Mullany, et al. 2018. “The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors among US States.” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Affiliation 319 (14): 1444–72.
  93. Nationwide Middle for Persistent Illness Prevention and Well being Promotion (US) Workplace on Smoking and Well being. 2014. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (US).
  94. Manuello, Jordi, Joosung Min, Paul McCarthy, Fidel Alfaro-Almagro, Soojin Lee, Stephen Smith, Lloyd T. Elliott, Anderson M. Winkler, and Gwenaëlle Douaud. 2024. “The Effects of Genetic and Modifiable Risk Factors on Brain Regions Vulnerable to Ageing and Disease.” Nature Communications 15 (1): 2576.
  95. Livingston, Gill, Jonathan Huntley, Andrew Sommerlad, David Ames, Clive Ballard, Sube Banerjee, Carol Brayne, et al. 2020. “Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care: 2020 Report of the Lancet Commission.” Lancet 396 (10248): 413–46.
  96. “Alcohol.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/alcohol.
  97. GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators. 2018. “Alcohol Use and Burden for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990-2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.” Lancet 392 (10152): 1015–35.
  98. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/alcohol/info.
  99. “Surveillance Report #120.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/surveillance-reports/surveillance120.
  100. Livingston, Michael, and Sarah Callinan. 2015. “Underreporting in Alcohol Surveys: Whose Drinking Is Underestimated?” Journal of Research on Alcohol and Medication 76 (1): 158–64.
  101. Boniface, Sadie, James Kneale, and Nicola Shelton. 2014. “Drinking Pattern Is More Strongly Associated with Under-Reporting of Alcohol Consumption than Socio-Demographic Factors: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Study.” BMC Public Well being 14 (1): 1297.
  102. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://ourworldindata.org/alcohol-consumption.
  103. Spencer, Merianne Rose, Sally C. Curtin, and Holly Hedegaard. 2020. “Rates of Alcohol-Induced Deaths among Adults Aged 25 and over in Urban and Rural Areas: United States, 2000-2018.” NCHS Knowledge Transient, no. 383 (October): 1–8.
  104. “No Degree of Alcohol Consumption Is Secure for Our Well being.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/04-01-2023-no-level-of-alcohol-consumption-is-safe-for-our-health.
  105. Biddinger KJ, Emdin CA, Haas ME, et al. “Association of Habitual Alcohol Intake With Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.” JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e223849.
  106. Kahane, Work by Charles. n.d. “Lives Saved by Car Security Applied sciences 1960 to 2012.” Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2015sae-kindelberger-livessaved.pdf.
  107. Inexperienced, A., G. Williams, R. Neale, V. Hart, D. Leslie, P. Parsons, G. C. Marks, et al. 1999. “Daily Sunscreen Application and Betacarotene Supplementation in Prevention of Basal-Cell and Squamous-Cell Carcinomas of the Skin: A Randomised Controlled Trial.” Lancet 354 (9180): 723–29.
  108. Inexperienced, Adèle C., Gail M. Williams, Valerie Logan, and Geoffrey M. Strutton. 2011. “Reduced Melanoma after Regular Sunscreen Use: Randomized Trial Follow-Up.” Journal of Medical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Medical Oncology 29 (3): 257–63.
  109. Tan, Yunfei, Lili Fang, Yichen Zhu, and Kenji Hashimoto. 2024. “Relationship between Hearing Loss and Depression: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2018.” Journal of Psychiatric Analysis 178 (October): 1–7.
  110. Bigelow, Robin T., Nicholas S. Reed, Katharine Ok. Brewster, Alison Huang, George Rebok, Bret R. Rutherford, and Frank R. Lin. 2020. “Association of Hearing Loss with Psychological Distress and Utilization of Mental Health Services among Adults in the United States.” JAMA Community Open 3 (7): e2010986.
  111. Wang, Hui-Fu, Wei Zhang, Edmund T. Rolls, Alzheimer’s Illness Neuroimaging Initiative, Yuzhu Li, Linbo Wang, Ya-Hui Ma, et al. 2022. “Hearing Impairment Is Associated with Cognitive Decline, Brain Atrophy and Tau Pathology.” EBioMedicine 86 (104336): 104336.
  112. Huang, Alison R., Kening Jiang, Frank R. Lin, Jennifer A. Deal, and Nicholas S. Reed. 2023. “Hearing Loss and Dementia Prevalence in Older Adults in the US.” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Affiliation 329 (2): 171–73.
  113. Hung, Shih-Chang, Kuan-Fu Liao, Chih-Hsin Muo, Shih-Wei Lai, Chia-Wei Chang, and Hung-Chang Hung. 2015. “Hearing Loss Is Associated with Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Case-Control Study in Older People.” Journal of Epidemiology 25 (8): 517–21.
  114. Campos, Laura, Allan Prochazka, Melinda Anderson, Alexander Kaizer, Carol Foster, and Timothy Hullar. 2023. “Consistent Hearing Aid Use Is Associated with Lower Fall Prevalence and Risk in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 71 (10): 3163–71.
  115. Riska, Kristal M., Sarah B. Peskoe, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Alexander Gordee, Juliessa M. Pavon, Se Eun Kim, Jessica S. West, and Sherri L. Smith. 2022. “Impact of Hearing Aid Use on Falls and Falls-Related Injury: Results from the Health and Retirement Study.” Ear and Listening to 43 (2): 487–94.
  116. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/occupant-protection/seat-belts/.
  117. Fleming, Eleanor B., Duong Nguyen, Joseph Afful, Margaret D. Carroll, and Phillip D. Woods. 2018. “Prevalence of Daily Flossing among Adults by Selected Risk Factors for Periodontal Disease-United States, 2011-2014.” Journal of Periodontology 89 (8): 933–39.
  118. Olsson, Bjørn. 2023. “Increased Bicycle Helmet Use in the Absence of Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Legislation: Prevalence and Trends from Longitudinal Observational Studies on the Use of Bicycle Helmets among Cyclists in Denmark 2004-2022.” Journal of Security Analysis 87 (December): 54–63.
  119. Bonyun, Marissa, Andi Camden, Colin Macarthur, and Andrew Howard. 2012. “Helmet Use in BIXI Cyclists in Toronto, Canada: An Observational Study.” BMJ Open 2 (3): e001049.
  120. Shool, Sina, Seyed Mohammad Piri, Zahra Ghodsi, Reza Tabrizi, Mohammad Hosein Amirzade-Iranaq, Mahdieh Mashayekhi, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh Ohadi, et al. 2024. “The Prevalence of Helmet Use in Motorcyclists around the World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 5,006,476 Participants.” Worldwide Journal of Damage Management and Security Promotion 31 (3): 431–69.
  121. Waltzman, Dana, Kelly Sarmiento, Xinjian Zhang, and Gabrielle F. Miller. 2023. “Estimated Prevalence of Helmet Use While Bicycling, Rollerblading, and Skateboarding among Middle School Students in Selected U.S. States- Youth Behavior Risk Survey, 2013-2019.” Journal of Security Analysis 87 (December): 367–74.
  122. Livingston, Gill, Jonathan Huntley, Andrew Sommerlad, David Ames, Clive Ballard, Sube Banerjee, Carol Brayne, et al. 2020. “Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care: 2020 Report of the Lancet Commission.” Lancet 396 (10248): 413–46.
  123. Kim, Eric S., Ying Chen, Julia S. Nakamura, Carol D. Ryff, and Tyler J. VanderWeele. 2022. “Sense of Purpose in Life and Subsequent Physical, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Health: An Outcome-Wide Approach.” American Journal of Well being Promotion: AJHP 36 (1): 137–47.

In the event you’re a coach, otherwise you wish to be…


You may assist individuals construct sustainable vitamin and way of life habits that may considerably enhance their bodily and psychological well being—whilst you make a terrific residing doing what you like. We’ll present you the way.


In the event you’d prefer to be taught extra, take into account the PN Level 1 Nutrition Coaching Certification. (You may enroll now at a giant low cost.)



Source link

Tags: ExtremehealthLongevityoptimizationTakes
Previous Post

Signs that you could be autistic?

Next Post

Something to Chew On: How Does Animal Protein Affect Aging? (Video)

MindNell

MindNell

Next Post
Something to Chew On: How Does Animal Protein Affect Aging? (Video)

Something to Chew On: How Does Animal Protein Affect Aging? (Video)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent News

John C. Fremont Healthcare District Board of Directors Special Meeting Agenda for Tuesday, June 2, 2025 – Sierra Sun Times

Depression, bipolar disorder after 40 may signal dementia risk: Study – Sambad English

09/06/2025
John C. Fremont Healthcare District Board of Directors Special Meeting Agenda for Tuesday, June 2, 2025 – Sierra Sun Times

Datametrex AI Announces $3M Private Placement for Healthcare Expansion – TipRanks

09/06/2025
Signs of Undiagnosed Autism in Adults

Signs of Undiagnosed Autism in Adults

09/06/2025
Exclusive: Pangea Data, AstraZeneca’s Alexion partner to spot rare disease with EHRs

Exclusive: Pangea Data, AstraZeneca’s Alexion partner to spot rare disease with EHRs

09/06/2025
MindNell

© 2025 MindNell  

Navigate Site

  • Privacy & Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Health Conditions
    • Cardiovascular
    • Autism
    • Cancer
    • COPD
    • Dementia
    • Digestive Health
  • Wellness
    • Youth’s Health & Wellness
    • Women’s Health & Wellness
    • Men’s Health & Wellness
    • Aging Health & Wellness
    • Sexual Health & Wellness
    • Pregnancy & Postnatal
    • Mental Health
      • Anxiety & Depression
      • ADHD
    • LGBTQI+
  • Fitness & Gym
    • Work Out
    • Yoga & Pilates
  • Parenting
  • Food & Nutrition
    • Healthy Drinks
    • Healthy Recipes
    • Vegans
  • Weight Loss
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Health & Wellness STORE

© 2025 MindNell