All through the 20th century, humanity’s pursuit of management over nature took a pointy flip—from historical farming practices to fashionable chemical warfare waged towards not simply human enemies however pests, weeds, and illness. The story of pesticides is just not merely certainly one of agricultural innovation; additionally it is a narrative of militarism, industrial growth, ecological upheaval, and a conflicted relationship with the pure world.
Pest management has historical roots. The primary indicators of people controlling pests date to greater than 70,000 years in the past, and historical Sumerians have been recognized to make use of sulfur compounds as early as 2500 BCE to guard their crops.[1] Different historical civilizations, together with the Greeks and Romans, employed arsenic, oils, and extracts from pure vegetation like tobacco or chrysanthemum to discourage bugs. These early strategies have been primarily based on commentary and fashioned the muse of what would later grow to be pest chemistry.
With the appearance of artificial chemistry within the late nineteenth century, stronger and focused substances started changing pure compounds. By the early 1900s, farmers have been utilizing lead arsenate and copper-based fungicides, such because the Bordeaux combination nonetheless in use right this moment. Whereas efficient, these have been extremely poisonous to people and the atmosphere, rapidly turning into pollution.
The pivotal shift got here throughout and after the First and Second World Wars. The worldwide arms race produced a surge in chemical analysis, and lots of the substances initially designed as nerve brokers or chemical weapons discovered postwar use in agriculture.
Essentially the most infamous instance is DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), synthesized in 1874 however used extra extensively throughout World Warfare II to fight the unfold of malaria and typhus amongst troops. Its success led to widespread civilian use postwar when it was praised and marketed for its effectiveness and affordability.[2] By the Nineteen Fifties, DDT was a staple in US agriculture and public well being, sprayed on crops, forests, and even houses.
Nevertheless, what was hailed as a miracle quickly became an ecological catastrophe. By the late Nineteen Fifties, scientists started documenting critical negative effects. Birds, particularly raptors just like the bald eagle, have been experiencing reproductive failure attributable to DDT-induced eggshell thinning. Bugs have been growing resistance, and residues have been accumulating in soil, water, and animal tissue. The backlash culminated with Rachel Carson’s 1962 guide, Silent Spring, which warned of an ecological disaster spurred by unregulated chemical use. Carson’s analysis helped impress the environmental motion and finally led to the US banning DDT in 1972.[3] More moderen studies present that well being issues linked to DDT have persevered throughout at the very least three generations, affecting granddaughters of girls uncovered to the chemical within the Nineteen Sixties. [4]
The pesticide trade didn’t retreat—it tailored. New artificial courses have been launched, comparable to organophosphates and carbamates, many derived from World Warfare II–period nerve brokers. These chemical substances focused insect nervous techniques and have been extensively used within the Nineteen Sixties and Nineteen Seventies.
This ushered in what scientists now name the “pesticide treadmill”—the cycle of pests growing resistance, prompting the creation of newer, typically extra poisonous chemical substances. Merchandise like glyphosate (Roundup) and neonicotinoids grew to become ubiquitous within the late twentieth century. And once more, considerations adopted: glyphosate’s hyperlinks to most cancers, neonics’ impacts on pollinators like bees, and the rising burden of pesticide publicity on farmworkers[5][6][7]
In the meantime, many of those chemical substances continued to originate from army analysis or have been produced by firms with protection contracts—additional blurring the road between conflict and agriculture.
Most of the main gamers within the pesticide trade, together with BASF, Bayer, Dow, and Monsanto, have deep roots in wartime chemical manufacturing. As an example, Bayer, now one of many largest agrochemical firms on the earth, was a part of IG Farben, a chemical conglomerate concerned in producing chemical weapons throughout World Warfare II with ties to Auschwitz.[8]
The legacy of utilizing wartime innovation for agricultural dominance has raised ongoing considerations in regards to the militarization of meals techniques, company consolidation, and the ethics of imposing management over ecosystems via drive slightly than practising stewardship.
As environmental crises mount, various fashions are gaining traction. Agroecology, regenerative farming, and built-in pest administration (IPM) prioritize ecological stability over chemical extermination. These strategies depend on biodiversity, pure predators, soil well being, and conventional ecological information to handle pests with minimal or no artificial enter.
Somewhat than waging conflict on nature, these approaches counsel that resilience lies in cooperation.
The historical past of pesticides is inseparable from the historical past of conflict—its applied sciences, philosophies, and collateral injury. But when we’re to shift course, we should additionally shift our metaphors. Pests aren’t enemies to annihilate however indicators of imbalance. Chemical substances aren’t impartial instruments—they carry historic, ecological, and moral weight. Nature is just not an enemy to subdue however a associate to grasp.
The query isn’t whether or not we will win the conflict on pests, however whether or not we will cease combating lengthy sufficient to construct one thing higher.
References
- Kolok, A.S. (2016). 70,000 Years of Pesticides. In: Trendy Poisons. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-609-7_12
- Varga T. DDT is nice for me-e-e! EarthlyMission.com. Accessed Could 5, 2025. https://earthlymission.com/ddt-is-good-for-me/
- US Environmental Safety Company (EPA). Press launch: DDT ban takes impact. EPA Internet Archive. December 31, 1972. https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/aboutepa/ddt-ban-takes-effect.html
- Cirillo PM, La Merrill MA, Krigbaum NY, Cohn BA. Grandmaternal Perinatal Serum DDT in Relation to Granddaughter Early Menarche and Grownup Weight problems: Three Generations within the Baby Well being and Growth Research Cohort. Most cancers Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(8):1480-1488. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1456
- Davoren MJ, Schiestl RH. Glyphosate-based herbicides and most cancers danger: a post-IARC choice evaluation of potential mechanisms, coverage and avenues of analysis. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39(10):1207-1215. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgy105
- Lindwall C. Neonicotinoids 101: The results on people and bees. Pure Assets Protection Council (NRDC). Could 25, 2022. https://www.nrdc.org/tales/neonicotinoids-101-effects-humans-and-bees
- Farmworker Justice. New Farmworker Justice report profiles risks of pesticide poisoning & presents suggestions for EPA motion. Accessed Could 6, 2025. https://www.farmworkerjustice.org/news-article/new-farmworker-justice-report-profiles-dangers-of-pesticide-poisoning-offers-recommendations-for-epa-action/
- The darkish historical past of Bayer chemical substances. Morning Star. September 19, 2016. https://morningstaronline.co.uk/a-ca73-The-dark-history-of-Bayer-chemicals-1
Copyright 2025 Heart for Diet Research. All rights reserved.
